CLINICAL RESEARCH |
|
Year : 2015 | Volume
: 36
| Issue : 4 | Page : 380-386 |
|
Efficacy of irrigation with different antimicrobial agents on periodontal health in patients treated for chronic periodontitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial
Shahabe Saquib Abullais1, Nitin Dani2, Hamiduddin3, N Priyanka4, Nitin Kudyar5, Anoop Gore2
1 Department of Periodontics and Community Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia 2 Department of Periodontics, M.G.V. Dental College and Hospital, Nasik, India 3 Department of Ilmul Saidla (Pharmacy), National Institute of Unani Medicine, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India 4 3Department of Periodontics, S.B. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Bidar, Karnataka, India 5 Department of Periodontics, Himachal Dental College and Hospital, Sundar Nagar, Himachal Pradesh, India
Correspondence Address:
Shahabe Saquib Abullais Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics and Community Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha Saudi Arabia
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0974-8520.190702
|
|
Introduction: Periodontitis is inflammation of supporting tooth structure. Most individuals get affected by this disease if oral hygiene is not maintained. There are various mechanical and chemical methods for oral hygiene maintenance. In recent past, interest has been diverted toward the herbal/traditional product in oral hygiene maintenance as they are free from untoward effect. Aim: To assess the efficacy of subgingival irrigation with herbal extract (HE) as compared with 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) on periodontal health in patients who have been treated for chronic periodontitis, and still have residual pocket of 3–5 mm. Materials and Methods: This was a controlled, single-blind, randomized study for 3 months. Patients were allocated in two groups (n = 15 each): (1) 0.2% CHX (control group); (2) HE consisting of Punica granatum Linn. (pomegranate), Piper nigrum Linn. (black pepper), and detoxified copper sulfate (test group). Solutions were used for the irrigation using pulsated irrigating device, WaterPik. Clinical outcomes evaluated were plaque index (PI), sulcus bleeding index (SBI), probing depth at baseline, 15th, 30th, 60th, and 90th day. Microbiologic evaluation was done at baseline and 90th day. Results: Significant reduction in PI was seen in the group of irrigation with HE. While comparing SBI, irrigation with CHX shows a better result. Other parameters such as probing pocket depth and microbiological counting were similar for both groups. Conclusion: Irrigation with HE is a simple, safe, and noninvasive technique with no serious adverse effects. It also reduces the percentage of microorganism in periodontal pocket. |
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|