AYU (An International Quarterly Journal of Research in Ayurveda)

REVIEW ARTICLE
Year
: 2012  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 343--347

A critical review on two types of Laghupanchamula


Shivani Ghildiyal1, Vinod Kumar Joshi2 
1 Senior Resident and PhD Scholar, Department of Dravyaguna, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Professor and Head, Department of Dravyaguna, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Shivani Ghildiyal
Department of Dravyaguna, Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi - 221 005, Uttar Pradesh
India

A group of five roots of small plants i.e., Shalaparni, Prshniparni, Brhati, Kantakari and Gokshura or Eranda is known as Laghupanchamula under Mishraka Varga (group of drugs). It is used as such or with Mahat Panchamula i.e., Bilva, Gambhari, Shyonaka, Agnimantha and Patala, constituting Dashamula, a well recognized and popular Ayurvedic preparation or as an ingredient of different dosage forms. Classical texts of Ayurveda differs regarding components of this Mishraka Varga. Four out of five drugs of Laghupanchamula are similar in all the Ayurvedic texts, but either Gokshura or Eranda is considered as the fifth drug. So a comphrenesive review of Veda, Samhita Grantha, Cikitsa Grantha and Nighantus, with regards to synonyms, contents, Guna- Karma, origin of variation in contents and possible thought behind two kinds of Laghupanchamula, to throw light for rational use of either Eranda or Gokshura under Laghupanchamula was conducted. It was observed that both the traditions were in practice however Acharya Kashyapa and Ravigupta were in view of Eranda as a fifth drug of Laghupanchamula where as Acharya Charaka, Sushruta, Vagabhatta, Yogaratnakara and Chakradatta are in favour of Gokshura. Infact, the variation in content depends on the need i.e Dosha, Dushya and Vyadhi.


How to cite this article:
Ghildiyal S, Joshi VK. A critical review on two types of Laghupanchamula.AYU 2012;33:343-347


How to cite this URL:
Ghildiyal S, Joshi VK. A critical review on two types of Laghupanchamula. AYU [serial online] 2012 [cited 2023 Jan 29 ];33:343-347
Available from: https://www.ayujournal.org/article.asp?issn=0974-8520;year=2012;volume=33;issue=3;spage=343;epage=347;aulast=Ghildiyal;type=0